Fiesta Faction banner

1.0L Ecoboost Dyno Results

53K views 25 replies 16 participants last post by  FI1L  
#1 · (Edited)
Completely stock.
87 octane. (~1,500 miles / Feb 19th 2014)
148whp / 150ft-lbs (134whp/136ft-lbs UNCORRECTED)
91 octane. (~800 miles / Jan 10th 2014)
146whp / 139ft-lbs (135whp/129ft-lbs UNCORRECTED)
100 octane Race Fuel. (~1,900 miles / Mar 8th 2014)
162whp / 150ft-lbs (142whp/135ft-lbs UNCORRECTED)

In my opinion, the power difference between 87 & 91 is within margin of error. We are contributing the 'power gains' in torque due to a motor that is more broken in at the 1500 mile mark versus 800 miles. Could also be environmental factors as well. If anything I personally would have expected 87 octane to yield lower results, so this was a little bit of a surprise.

100 Octane Race Fuel should not be used as a comparison to standard pump fuels. Race Fuels may contain formulas that sometimes yield higher power outputs over traditional unleaded. Take the corrected numbers from the 100 octane run with a grain of salt, the correction factor was fairly high during dyno day. Video & Sheets are below. Since I was allowed a single printout on dyno day, I opted for uncorrected printouts. I'm willing to bet the 180ft/lbs corrected number in the video is suppose to be 150ft/lbs, that may have been a miscommunication to the person writing the results on the board.

Datalogged output using Torque Pro on my phone, just a tick under 20psi at the peak using 91 octane, and 19psi using 87, I haven't analyzed the logs from 100 octane yet.

Comparison between 87 & 91 octane:
Image


87 Octane Datalog:
Image


Original 91 octane runs:
Image


91 Octane Datalog:
Image

It's amazing how flat the AFR's remain. Direct injection allows for some impressive mixtures under boost.

Image


For those who would like to see raw numbers:
87 Octane Feb 19th 2014 Run:
Correction Factor: 1.109
Temp: 77.79F
Pressure: 26.858 InHg
Humidity: 7.872%
134whp/136ft-lbs UNCORRECTED

91 Octane Jan 10th 2014 Run:
Correction Factor: 1.078
Temp: 62.84F
Pressure: 27.136 InHg
Humidity: 15.108%
135whp/129ft-lbs UNCORRECTED

The dyno operator never veers from the analog inputs. I have pictures of these environmentals from both runs. If anyone is interested I can post them as well.

*UPDATE*
UNCORRECTED dyno sheets:
Image


Image


YouTube video from Dyno Day 3-8-2014 (Fiesta @ 1:24 mark):

 
#4 · (Edited)
Hey dirtbag (hehe will always giggle replying to your screen name),

Are there any mods out there yet for this car? The HP is only 35 or so less than a stock Fiesta ST. The torque though is no where near a Fiesta ST. That one extra cyl does the trick! I'm wondering what it would take to get to the 180 HP range to equal an ST? Still couldn't compete without that torque, but would be nice to get into the 180 ballpark. Probably takes a lot though. What will your first mod be??
PS. I'm soooo darn close to getting a red 1.0 like yours!! Just can't see paying $600 dealer doc fees and so far they won't budge!! Argh!!!
 
#5 ·
.........I'm wondering what it would take to get to the 180 HP range to equal an ST?
.....What will your first mod be??
PS. I'm soooo darn close to getting a red 1.0 like yours!! Just can't see paying $600 dealer doc fees and so far they won't budge!! Argh!!!
I don't think the 1.0L will ever get to the ST performance levels and maintain the reliable and/or cost factor. The ST is so much more of a car all around. It'd be like chasing an uphill battle. At 180whp I'm almost certain would require a higher octane fuel and maybe a larger turbo, running that would only be realistic at the track. Driving around on $7.50/gal 100 octane fuel would be expensive. However, I may be able to squeeze more low end/midrange torque by throwing more boost at it. But up top you can see the tiny turbo is running out of breath above 5,000 rpms.

I hear ya on a new car purchase. It makes no financial sense on purchasing a new car. Throw in 1st year registration, sales tax, insurance, and depreciation it's a bit of a hit right away. You're better off waiting a couple years and pick up an ST or 1.0L Ecoboost second hand. My reason for buying this specific car was purely emotional. It's almost like a win for the Americas that we finally start getting a taste of what's offered overseas. I just hope the 1.0L is a success to a point where plenty of them are available to second hand purchasers for both performance enthusiasts and ecomodders. It's quite a fun car.

I'm waiting for SCT and Superchips to have something available. I need a way to tune the ECU before I start throwing bolt-ons at it. I'll update the thread under the performance section as I make mods.
 
#12 ·
I think Ford is doing us a favour by forcing us to buy the steel wheels.

Have you seen how crappy their painted alloys look after five years ?

Now go look at the steelies with wheel covers after five years.

The odd package is Ford's way of telling you that $995 is not enough to get you this engine.